Canada's Post Secondary Education Web & Marketing Conference

#PSEWEB


Archive for the ‘Facebook’


How effective is your Facebook page? 6

Posted on August 10, 2010 by JP Rains

So you manage a page on Facebook. You have 4,000 “fans” and have spent $500 to get there. You’re thrilled management is buying in and the results are starting to show. You feel you got your money’s worth because you believe each fan is worth $3.86.

Once you have gained this mass amount of fans, what do you do with them?

You may be pressed with the feeling that you have to post each day, or that your fans are going to expect daily updates.

Realistically, the average facebook users will log in once every two days, meaning they get updates from their 130 friends and 80 pages. Unless your brand is something they want to see each time they login, you don’t need to be there every day.

A slippery slope on facebook is inundating your users with messaging. If users start to see your brand too much, and aren’t interacting with it, you won’t appear in their news feeds, due to the patented Facebook algorithm. Worse yet, users may just unsubscribe (goodbye ROI). The more interactions occur with your messages, the more likely you are to appear in a fan’s news feed.

Within your Facebook insights you have some powerful measures that can be used as Key Performance Indicators. Following these measures is actually seeing if your messaging is working. You may have 4,000 fans, but only be seen in 40 news feeds (it would be great if we had this information).

Here are some readily accessible performance indicators for your page.

  • Monthly Active Users
  • Unique Page Views (daily quotient)
  • Post Quality ( a function of interactions per post on a weekly basis)

Keep in mind that unless your page is a location where users will seek out information on a regular basis, your messages to news feeds are your only real connection to users. Grouping posts, condensing messaging as well as creating baiting posts (subject of next blog) will help with this.

What are your challenges with managing a Facebook page?

-JP

Facebook Pages: Mobile photo & status update from iPhone 0

Posted on August 09, 2010 by Melissa Cheater

As a personal user, the Facebook mobile applications have left me a little underwhelmed.

As a business user, the iPhone Facebook application is a great tool for anyone who has a Facebook Page – but doesn’t have any other properties (i.e. Twitter). Once you add Twitter, Hootsuite becomes a great tool but if Facebook is all you work with, then Facebook for iPhone gets the job done quick and easy.

The key is adding your pages to your favourites screen within the application.

Add Your Pages to Favourites

  1. Open the app
  2. Click the grid icon in the upper left corner
  3. Swipe to the left to get to your Favourites page
  4. Click the “+” plus icon in the upper right corner
  5. Click Pages in the bottom right
  6. Select the page you would like to add from the list
  7. Done!

Updating Your Facebook Page

  1. Open the app
  2. Click the grid icon in the upper left corner
  3. Swipe to the left to get to your Favourites page
  4. Click on the page you would like to update
  5. For a status update, go ahead and enter into the What’s on your mind? box
  6. For a photo upload, click the camera icon to the left of the What’s on your mind? box

Huge thanks to @jjloa for this great tip at #pseweb last May!

Facebook & LinkedIn show better results over time for sharing links 0

Posted on February 05, 2010 by Melissa Cheater

Our redesigned alumni newsletter was emailed out this past Tuesday evening. On Wednesday morning, we created 3 separate bit.ly links and used each on a different social network when promoting the online newsletter.
We posted status updates with the links on Twitter and Facebook, and started a discussion including the link on our LinkedIn alumni group.
Twitter started showing clicks immediately, and LinkedIn showed almost no reaction at first. Facebook was somewhere in the middle. After a few hours, Twitter stopped showing activity, Facebook continued to plod along and LinkedIn started showing activity.
In the end, Facebook brought us the highest number of clicks (9 of a total 22). LinkedIn came in second over Twitter (7 of 22), and Twitter brought in 6 (of 22)
Here is a little table:

Population Clicks % that clicked
LinkedIn 2405 7 0.3%
Facebook 638 9 1.4%
Twitter 263 6 2.3%

Observations:

  • Twitter responded the quickest, but had little impact after the first burst
  • Facebook and LinkedIn provided results over time: content on these networks has a longer lifespan
  • Facebook yielded the best return for us but Twitter users were the most engaged
  • The LinkedIn post would have been emailed to the 2,000+ members of the group whereas neither of the other networks would have had this type of support

Overall, I’m glad that there are services such as Seesmic/ping.fm and TweetDeck that streamline this for us – because 22 clicks is not a huge yield out of an overall audience of 3,306 (0.6%). LinkedIn is the service that I haven’t been able to streamline yet, which means that I have to post once to Twitter+Facebook, and then post a second time to LinkedIn – and it’s also the service that had the lower return.

Note: I could probably update all 3 in a single go via ping.fm, so I should look at this with our next announcement (though lately we’ve been trying to do individual posts on each network as much as possible, rather than carbon copies across all three). #hashtags seem to throw off some Facebook users, also Facebook has a higher character count as does LinkedIn, etc.

FacebookGate: Canadian Style? 0

Posted on June 03, 2009 by Melissa Cheater

Yesterday, Matthew Melnyk (@matthewmelnyk) spotted a Facebook Group linking to 16 other Facebook Groups targetting applicants to Canadian universities.  There are many reasons why it is suspected that these groups are not only run by marketers who are pretending to be students, but also have malicious intent in mind.  Bottom line, now is a critical time to search for your school name on Facebook and see who is using it to target your audiences.

What are 2013 groups?

In 2007 it was pretty obvious that higher ed applicants wanted to connect with others that were considering the same schools.  Some student figured Facebook was a neat place to do this and created a group called <School Name> Class of 2011.  By the end of the recruitment cycle there were hundreds of Class of 2011 groups, one for almost every college in North America and each with hundreds of members.  In 2008 we had Class of 2012 groups, and now we have Class of 2013 groups.

FacebookGate 2008

In December, I went away on vacation (woah!) and came back to tens if not hundreds of Class of 2013 Facebook Groups created by fake accounts posing as soon-to-be freshmen.  1,000s of students were joining these groups. Now, really this is brilliant, because now party behind this (collegeprowler.com) happens to be in the education business and now has sleuth access to the Facebook inboxes of all the students that have joined these groups – again this is thousands of high school seniors and other incoming college students.

@bradjward, education blogger extra-ordinaire, and one of the forces behind BlueFuego.com, picked up on the fact that groups were being administrated by fake students.  With some amazing use of twitter, google docs and other collaboration tools, within about 24 hours he and other higher education colleagues were able to make the connection to collegeprowler.com, and Facebook deleted all of the groups created by these fake accounts literally overnight.

FacebookGate Canada

Yesterday, I get out of back to back meetings and find this on Twitter:

Twitter Post from @MatthewMelnyk, June 2 2009

Twitter Post from @MatthewMelnyk, June 2 2009

Matt is throwing an FYI to me (@mmbc) here because we had chatted about his school’s 2013 groups a few months ago, I think. (And I appreciate the heads up!)

Here is the link he is referring to:

Screencapture of "Grads of 2009 (Canada)" Facebook Group

Screencapture of "Grads of 2009 (Canada)" Facebook Group

This group lists Class of 2013 groups, each affiliated with a major Canadian university.

Let’s talk about Brock

Earlier this year, there were two Facebook Groups tagged Brock 2013. Both of them had less than 5 members. My advice to the school was to contact both group administrators and ask if a school rep could be appointed as a group administrator – to provide official content when valuable. One group appointed a school rep as admin and the group grew from 2 members (the creator and school rep) to now 744 members.

Screencapture of Brock Class of '13 Facebook Group, affiliated with Brock University staff (June 2 2009)

Screencapture of Brock Class of '13 Facebook Group, affiliated with Brock University staff (June 2 2009)

The Second Group

The second group was not interested in participation from a school rep, which is fine. It had 2 members and the other Brock group was growing healthily.  It was interesting to note though, that both the creator and administrator of this other group were Brock alumni – not Brock applicants. One of them was in fact a local landlord who worked mostly with student rentals. There was no obvious spam from this person that I could see on the page, but still his interests are questionable. Especially when a month or so later I started receiving group updates from a St. Catherine’s student rentals Facebook Group that I had never heard of, let alone joined.

The same individual was an administrator of a Class of 2012 group that collected almost 2,000 members.

Screencapture of Brock 2012 group administrated by Brock alumnus and local realtor, June 2 2009

Screencapture of Brock 2012 group administrated by Brock alumnus and local realtor, June 2 2009

FacebookGate vs Brock

The first link on the Grads of 2009 Facebook Group is to Brock University – but not to the happy community of 700+ prospects.  Instead it links to a group with only one member, claiming to be “real” and that Brock is interfering with student groups and having them deleted:

“Brock staff (namely Matthew Melnyk) have been trying to get control over brock facebook groups. And when the student creators dont make them admins they file copyright claims to facebook and get the groups DELETED.”

Screencapture of new Brock 2013 group attacking university staff, June 2 2009

Screencapture of new Brock 2013 group attacking university staff, June 2 2009

According to Matthew, the staff member being attacked, there have been individuals spamming the 700+ member 2013 group aggressively:

“I have been in a battle with some of these accounts for over a month now (as is evidenced by their annoyance at me evident in the fake Brock 2013 group).

I dealt with spam on our group posted nearly every ½ hour by dummy accounts hoping to mislead Brock students to join their group. I reported them, and their group to facebook who eventually acted. Unfortunately, it’s a bit like wack-a-mole. One dummy account goes down, another pops up.”

Why is Grads of 2009 FacebookGate Round 2?

Let’s start with the group Grads of 2009.  The administrator, “Joe Ally,” has no network, no friends and no Send Message or Add As Friend functions on his profile.  Every profile has these unless they are important enough of a person for Facebook to build them their very own profile different from what the rest of us get.

Screencapture of Joe Ally Facebook Profile, June 2 2009

Screencapture of Joe Ally Facebook Profile, June 2 2009

Now let’s look at the groups that Grads of 2009 is linking to.

Screencapture of McMaster 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Screencapture of McMaster 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

This group seems to use language in tune with an actual Mac applicant.  It has links to macinsiders.com, which I believe is a student run site (but not university run).  But I do notice that the admin is from New York. Totally possible. If you look back to the Brock 2013 group attacking Matthew, you’ll notice that its admin is also from New York.

Comments on the group date back to the beginning of March, and the “first” comment has to do with needing admins for the group. I see this again on other groups.

Screencapture of SFU 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Screencapture of SFU 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

When I click the SFU 2009 link provided by Grads of 2009, I get the above screen. I’ve got a flag here because I’m getting an error, and I’m also getting a flag because it says “Event” unavailable – when i was trying to load a group.

Screencapture of TWU 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Screencapture of TWU 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Above we have the Trinity Western University group that Grads of 2009 links to.  We have an admin from Ottawa, which feels good to me.  We also have only 21 members and a Group name that has just about every keyword in the book – which says marketer to me.  I’m also noticing that their oldest comment is May 8th – not that long ago. This is a new group.

Screencapture of UBC 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Screencapture of UBC 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Here on the UBC group, we have an admin who has disabled communication features (totally logical, lots of normal people do this – so not a bad sign).

wlu2013_fullThe WLU group link gives a similar error message to SFU.

Screencapture of Queens' 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Screencapture of Queens' 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

With the Queen’s group, I’m seeing a title stuffed with key words (two spellings of Queens, two ways of saying 2009/2013).  I’m seeing a tacky display image that looks A LOT like the one on the angry Brock group.  And I’m noticing the admin’s name. I’m also noticing the language “Post a photo and introduce yourself” – which is also on the Brock group.

Screencapture of Ryerson 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Screencapture of Ryerson 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

The Ryerson group has the same admin from Ottawa that is running the TWU group, and the second admin is Joe Ally (Mr. Fake Profile /w no add as friend or send message features, remember?).  Also, if you read the group description the first paragraph is the same as on the UBC group above. Read further and see how aggressively the group is pushing members to 1) virally spread the group to friends, and 2) post a picture (same as Queens and Brock).  The final paragraph even says that anyone who spams the group on other Ryerson/2013 groups will get promoted to administrator status.

Screencapture of the McGill 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

Screencapture of the McGill 2013 group linked from Grads of 2009, June 3 2009

The McGill group shouts out that the other groups are spam (even though they were deleted 4 months ago) and details the first FacebookGate and even links to @bradjward’s blog.  Check out who the admin is though: same girl that runs Queens.  I want to believe she is legit, because unlike Joe Ally her profile does have the usual Add/Message features.  But remember that Queens used the same language as other groups?

All in all, I think the McMaster group is legit.  The Ryerson, Brock and UBC groups are definitely not.  And the others, might just be entangled/tricked by whatever the fake account holders have been saying behind closed inboxes.  I find this incredibly disheartening. Students used technology to satisfy a social goal (meet other soon-to-be-classmates). In December, collegeprowler.com took advantage of the trend and now it is happening again.  I have no idea what Facebook is supposed to do – as Matthew said, people who are deleted just sign back up again under new names.  It’s just so frustrating to see such a great user innovation get infected by sneak marketers, to the point where eventually the trend will die because the groups are unreliable.  Maybe this will lead to a rise in private applicant communities run by each institution? Brock already has one, and the 2009 E-Expectations report found that 75% of respondents believed schools should offer invite only communities for applicants.

If you are reading this, and are an admin on any of these groups, or have any insight, please post a comment or email me – I would love to have a clearer picture of what is actually happening hear.

  • join our mailing list

  • Recent Posts

  • #PSEWEB on Twitter



↑ Top